Zero Waste and Landfilling
Before we talk about the "zero waste" and "landfilling", we should have the knowledge about them. "Landfilling" means that we dig a hole in the ground and fill whatever rubbish inside the hole. Meanwhile, "zero waste" means that all the rubbish we produce can be recycled so that nothing is wasted within the cycle.
Since they are two different methods to deal with the garbage, we need to know the differences between these two methods. first of all, the method of "zero waste" saves a lot of resources but the method of "landfilling" does not. In addition, the "zero waste" needs us to improve the technology and it takes time. However, the "landfilling" is relatively simpler.
Moreover, these two methodsstill have some similarities. The most important point is that they are both to solve the garbage problem and try to make our life easier.
After we know the differences and similarities between these two methods, we need to take them to the real life application. For my own country, China, both of the methods have their own places. For urban areas which are more developed, the method of "zero waste" is better. For the rural areas, most likely, they will use the "landfilling".
In conclusion, both the "zero waste" and "landfilling" have their own advantages at this point of time. However, as time goes on, the technology will improve, so that "zero waste" may become a need and the "landfilling" may be out of time.
3 comments:
may be your paragraph writing will be more better if you could give some detailed examples and elaborations.
Yes, this would be better, Steve, if you could give some specific examples. You discuss the two schemes very generally.
Also, I'd like to see you develop a topic sentence (or thesis) that combines your discussion of the two schemes with an assertion about what method should be used in China.
haha
some examples will make it better.
Maybe it's time limited.
Next time it will be better!
Post a Comment